Wednesday, 29 December 2021
ટેકો અને ટેકાના ભાવ
Sunday, 25 July 2021
Try Not to Abuse Your Power
Sunday, 27 June 2021
Language Lab Review - DELL Software
The home screen of the student console, where several language learning components are given |
Teacher Console from which teacher can monitor the learners activities and progress |
The full setup of the server desktop with 2.1 sound system for audio output and microphones for input |
The demonstration of the software by Dr. Dilip Barad via YouTube |
Based on the audio clip one has to answer the questions |
By selecting the answers, we can see the correct ones |
The given topics in the Table of Contents (ToC) |
Monday, 21 June 2021
International Yoga Day - June 2021
The Banners at the English Department |
Friday, 18 June 2021
Shiva Baby | Film and Culture | Openness of Thought
Tuesday, 15 June 2021
The Doctor's Word by R. K. Narayan
Sunday, 6 June 2021
Assignment 16 - English Language Teaching-2
Assignment 15 - Cinema and OTT Platforms as a Medium of Communication
Department of English
Maharaja Krishnakumarsihnji Bhavnagar University
Written Assignment – Paper 15
Cinema and OTT Platforms as a Medium of Communication
Submitted by Rohit Vyas
M.A. English (2019-21)
Semester 4
Roll No: 19
Paper 15 – Mass Communication and
Media Studies,
Unit – 3
PG Enrolment Number:
2069108420200041
E-mail:
rohitvyas277@gmail.com
Introduction
To
start the assignment, let’s put a question first. Is it true that we can’t
communicate without language? What if we humans wouldn’t have speech, language?
Indeed there is a gesture theory which could help understand the non-verbal communication.
But can we possibly state that without language we can converse? The answer
would be ‘no’. There are several answers to the question as such and especially
in the 21st century it’s quite a worth to discuss about communication
and its mediums.
In
the very beginning, there were several ways to communicate, like kite flying,
sending birds as a messenger and so on. Later on, there came postal services
and telegrams. Telephones were the first invention to be in the category of
audio communication services. Then, mobile phones, SMS services, email
services, smartphones and the series of modern electronic gadgets made communication
seamless and effortless.
On
the parallel, there were several modes of entertainment which became popular
among the masses. Historically looking at the aspect of entertainment, there
was a variety of activities like street arts, puppet shows, play performances,
folk cultural performances and so on. Largely, today, there are mediums beyond just
television and radio. Cinema was the emerging one as a revolutionary medium of communication,
which served a large purpose of entertainment also.
The definition of communication
According to Oxford definitions,
The activity or
process of expressing ideas and feelings or of giving people information Speech
is the fastest method of communication between people. (Oxford Definitions)
The
basic purpose of communication is to pass messages and information from one end
to another. To refer to a basic process of how communication takes place,
Stuart Hall’s trajectory would help.
The encoder creates the message either in form of written things, speaking, or making a gesture. The message is decoded by the receiver who understands the encoded message by reading, or listening or making sense of the gesture.
Cinema and Its Emergence
According to a website dedicated to
cinema,
No one person invented cinema. However,
in 1891 the Edison Company successfully demonstrated a prototype of the
Kinetoscope, which enabled one person at a time to view moving pictures.
(Science and Media Museum)
“The first permanent studio, opened in
1911, was Nestor Studio. Major studios with names that are still familiar
today, including Paramount, Warner Bros., and Columbia, soon followed. By the
1920s, movie making was the dominant industry in the area.” (Paxson)
If
Indian cinema is to be discussed, one can state that Alam Ara was the first talkie
film released in March 1931. Before that release, there was a first full length
silent film titled Raja Harishchandra, released in 1913.
Wherein
the Western countries,
The
1927 movie The Jazz Singer is often cited as the first successful talkie, or
movie that included recorded dialogue. Audio technology changed the movie
industry in several ways. (Paxson)
Several
awards like Oscar, IIFA, Filmfare, BAFTA, Academy awards, Golden Globe Awards are
given to best films to appreciate and encourages quality content in films.
The Purpose
What
purpose do the films serve in communication? There may be several arguments for
the question but to be precise, films basically serve two purposes, one of them
is for entertainment and the other is for conveying messages to masses.
Messages, are more of a concern for highlighting the contemporary issues and encouraging
people to bring societal changes of the given era. In such way, it can be said
that movies, like literature are the mirror to society.
If
one looks for the structure of the communication that takes place in films is
as follows.
The film contains a message or multiple nuggets of messages that applies to larger benefits to society. Then people having different identities like students, critics and laymen consume the film in various ways and analyze important factors from the film. Some of them capture the timely nuances of fashions, trends in technology, human behavior at large, scripting, narration and filmography, issues in society, and many other aspects. So the mode of communication can be said that it is single to multi. The messages transfers from one medium to masses.
Cinema in 21st Century
Before
bringing the modern cinema into consideration one may look for the traditional genres
of the films which were prevalent and popular in the past. Historical drama, fiction,
love drama, patriotic drama, suspense thriller, horror, comedy and documentary
were some of the famous genres. To name a few films, Mugha-e-Azam, Shahid
Bhagat Singh, Paakizah, Shree 420, Jaagte Raho, Silsila, Coolie, were some of
the said genres.
Just
like the early period of cinema, the new gust of the films established another
variations in the filmmaking industry. Sci-fi thriller, docu-drama, physiological
thriller, horror-comedy are some of the new genres. The use of different
production technology and film cameras have made the film production much faster
than all the previous decades. VFX is the technology used for graphical
movements, IMAX, 3D, 5D and 4K, Dolby Digital, Dolby Ultra are the video and
audio perfection technologies which enhances the end consumer experience. Some
of the examples are, Avatar (2009), Inception, Jurrasic Park, Magic Magic (2003),
Dunkirk etc.
Over-the-top OTT platforms
As
the newest of the form of cinema is now getting narrowed down to the hand held
devices such as tablets and smartphones, and came in the new form called OTT,
the movie watchers are having personalized experience. This is considered as
drastic change in the entertainment industry.
Over-the-top
platforms surpass the film screens, theatres and film distributors, reaching directly
to the consumer’s device. It was earlier called as home viewing. Where in the television
it was called as movie-on-demand. The genres are also emerging and more sub-genres
like adventures, adult-rated, sexually abusive language, and so on.
Netflix
was found in the year 1997. An OTT platform which is popular throughout the
world. Another platform is from Amazon prime video. Thereafter many film
companies and production studios have launched their own OTT platforms, such as
Zee5, ALT Balaji, Disney+, Voot Select, OHO Gujarati, and several others.
As
Paxson cites about the early stages of OTT platforms and the emergence of home
viewing experiences, he states:
“One potential benefit for both the
movie industry and movie viewers is that even if a movie is not as successful
in theaters as its creators hoped, that movie can still generate revenue in the
home viewing market. Indeed, some movies that are determined to be unlikely to
make a profit in the theaters are released directly to video formats.” (Paxson)
Conclusion
As
above mentioned, the importance of audio visual media has emerged as good
medium of communication, cinema and OTT platforms are contributing at large in communication.
Majority of youth gets more influenced by the OTT programs. But there’s a
hidden threat of getting misguided from false inspirations. In some cases
parental advisory and guidance is necessary for kids and younger teenagers.
Cinema is a matter of what’s in the frame and what’s out.
― Martin Scorsese
Cinema
is for society and society creates the cinematic content. As mentioned earlier,
cinema mirrors the zeitgeist of time, culture, society, and politics. So as
society reacts accordingly after watching the content. Thus, both, cinema and
ott platforms are a medium of communication which serve the purpose of entertainment
and conveying meanings.
Work Cited
Paxson,
Peyton. Mass Communications and Media Studies: An Introduction. PDF, Continuum,
2010.
Reference:
Park,
Sungwook, and Young-Sun Kwon. Research on the Relationship Between the Growth
of OTT Service Market and the Change in the Structure of the Pay-TV Market.
PDF, 2019.
Assignment 14 - Tradition and Modernity in ‘The Swamp Dwellers’
Department of English
Maharaja Krishnakumarsihnji Bhavnagar University
Written Assignment – Paper 14
Tradition and Modernity in ‘The Swamp Dwellers’
Submitted by Rohit Vyas
M.A. English (2019-21)
Semester 4
Roll No: 19
Paper 14 – African Literature, Unit
– 4
PG Enrolment Number:
2069108420200041
E-mail: rohitvyas277@gmail.com
Introduction
The key
objective of this assignment is to highlight and bring in front the binary yet,
worthwhile conflict of tradition and modernity in light of a play The Swamp
Dwellers written by Wole Soyinka, who is a Nigerian playwright, novelist
and poet. He belongs to a traditional Yoruba tribe and culture which is
reflected in the play as well. He is also awarded Nobel Prize in Literature in
1986. In his Nobel Speech he has stated as following.
"For me, justice is the first condition of
humanity." – Wole Soyinka.
About the Play
The Swamp
Dwellers, the very title suggests the age long neglected and marginalized human
beings who strive to live better life like citi-zens. Here an intentional use
of this hyphen suggests the class divide between villagers and city residents.
The play not only draws the parallel between the poor and rich but also makes a
trajectory of thoughts which travel from one generation to another.
The
Swamp, which means a loose grounded muddy land, which can also be seen as a
very curious metaphor which can be pictured as mental captivity of one’s own
thoughts. Especially when one faces issues with the succeeding generations, in
terms of thought conflicts. Symbolically, the swamps can also be seen as
traditional mindset of people in which society vainly struggles to come out
from. The Setting of the play is southern Nigeria. Alu and Makuri are parents
who live in the swamps, and they have two sons, Awuchike and Igwezu. Both sons
are living in the city. The play begins with the arrival of Igwezu. He comes
from city and is in the debt of his brother Awuchike. Desala, who is Igwezu’s
wife leaves him and marries Awuchike because of his wealth. Just in time,
Igwezu comes to know that the Kadiye who is priest of Satan god, takes
sacrifices from people. Moreover to his prayers, he also lives a lavish life as
compared to swamp dwellers.
Awuchike
is an absent character who never returns to swamp. He is present only in the
conversation of Alu, Makuri and Igwezu.
The Conflict
It seems
difficult at some point to make a statement or conclude which one is more
favorable. But the conflict is not only limited to traditional value systems
and modern beliefs. The area is much extended to the high family bondage.
Whenever an individual comes across the issue like family life and its
importance, one can easily decipher the contrast of joint family and nuclear
family. In the play Awuchike is believed to be dead to his family,
because he never returns to the swamps. Although it can be stated that death is
also used as a symbol in the play.
Family bondage
The human being,
as known as true at large, is a social animal. To cite Aristotle’s quote,
“Man is by nature a social animal; an
individual who is unsocial naturally and not accidentally is either beneath our
notice or more than human. Society is something that precedes the individual.
Anyone who either cannot lead the common life or is so self-sufficient as not
to need to, and therefore does not partake of society, is either a beast or a
god. ” – Aristotle, Politics
The age old
family value system looks towards the collective development of every member of
the family. For reference, one can see the Indian family system with this
reference. During the marriage ceremony, a groom marries a bride, takes the
oath to take the equal responsibly and take care of bride’s family, and bride also
takes the oath for the same. All this oath taking and accepting one another’s
parents as a family in whole can only flourish when there is love, which is
more complex and abstract basic human emotion, which, if aptly worked upon, can
create a good bondage between two families.
As the time
passes, one can see some changes within this structure of family based system.
The succeeding generation questions the traditional values and established
rituals. The minute observation provides the visible outcomes that youth, in
general tends to go away from home, liberate themselves from the responsibilities
and finds a new way of living on their own. To give more clear idea about such
social structure a quote can be cited here:
[In other
words,] while the behavior patterns of archaic humans remained fixed for tens
of thousands of years, Sapiens could transform their social structures, the
nature of their interpersonal relations, their economic activities, and a host
of other behaviors within a decade or two. (Harari, 38)
Alongside, if
one makes further advancement in the idea of family bondage, one can safely
state that, time has changed many notions about marriage, religion and social
structures.
Here, in light
of the play Awuchike is dead to his parents, so it can be seen as disowning
one’s own children in modern society. Moreover, Awuchike also turns his back
off to the family. So his disrespect is also the cause of the symbolic death.
Faith or Blind
faith?
Another aspect
of the play which quite suitably advocate the duo of tradition and modernity is
faith. One could raise a question about faith, trust, and blind faith. What can
be the aftermaths of blind faith? Well, it is largely seen with the synonymous
word ‘hope’. Since years, people have believed in several myths in different
religions. Christianity has Satan and God, good and evil. Hinduism has Dev and
Danav and so on.
Kaidye is a
character in the present play who preaches people and asks for sacrifices of
whatever good materials they have. His physical appearance is more fat and
likely to be living a very lavish life than other villagers. Swamp dwellers value
the soil. But the character of Kadiye is questioned by Igwezu.
Kadiye becomes
speechless and doesn’t answer Igwezu’s questions, and his silence proves that
his is a traitor. Many superstitions lead to death of people and chaos also.
Though Igwezu could have followed the Kadiye as he had lost everything like
fortune, his standing as a man, as he also lost his wife. It is believed that
when one has lost everything or very little to care, s/he may turn to blind
faiths and superstitions. Youth and women largely come under such bad
influences. But like Igwezu one can opt for remaining free to question and do
critical thinking.
Modernity
Do we ever know what is to be modern? Where do we locate the word modernity and traditions? Just like an individual takes the growth in a given environment, it may give much satisfactory outcome if the environment is nurtured fully in a child. The civility in the manners, cultured way of behavior and tactics, and as above mentioned in the quote, interpersonal interactions with society denotes the term modernity for an individual.
In the play we find Awuchike as an absent character yet he represents modernity in a particular way. His remaining in the city and not returning to the swamps itself justifies the curious and cunning statement of his modernity. There are few drawbacks of modernity as well. Awuchike even puts his brother in debt. His father Makuri cries out of worry and sorrow as follows:
Makuri: It ruins them. The city ruins them. What do they seek there except money? (Soyinka)
The materialist approach or the attraction for material wealth is also being highlighted by Soyinka. Desala, wife of Igwezu leaves him due to his poor condition and loss in business. She marries his brother Awuchike who lives in city and has much wealth.
Yoruba culture
The play contains many cultural symbols. Yoruba is a tribe in which Soyinka is given a synonym to it. As in an article stated:
Soyinka's triumph begins with Yoruba culture, often
when the results of his work are examined, critics will formulate that Yoruba
culture is Wole Soyinka and Wole Soyinka is Yoruba culture. (Baihaki, Yakob, 8)
Conclusion
Tradition and modernity
are largely seen as opposites to one another but, one can also argue that they
are supplements. The presence of one thing creates the necessity of the other.
The second thing, by coming to an existence, creates the relative bond with the
first one. Modernity has their own advantage but it exist because there was a
tradition at first place. Soyinka has neatly knitted both the things in the
play The Swamp Dwellers.
Works Cited
Baihaqi, Muhammad, and Muhammad Yakob. "YORUBA CULTURE INFLUENCE INTO CONTEMPORARY STAGE THROUGH WOLE SOYINKA’S THE SWAMP DWELLERS." Elite Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, June 2019, http://journal.uin alauddin.ac.id/index.php/elite/article/view/7929.
Soyinka, Wole. 1969. “Three Short Plays: The Swamp Dwellers, the Trials of Brother Jero, the Strong Breed”. London: Oxford University Press.
Thursday, 3 June 2021
Assignment 13 - New Literatures
Department of English
Maharaja Krishnakumarsihnji Bhavnagar University
Written Assignment – Paper 13
Unreliable Narration in ‘The Sense of an Ending’
Name: Rohit Vyas
Semester 4
Roll No: 19
PG Enrolment Number:
2069108420200041
E-mail: rohitvyas277@gmail.com
Course: M.A. English (2019-21)
Paper 13 – New Literatures, Unit –
2
Introduction
The Sense of an
Ending is a postmodern novel written by Julian Barnes in 2011. The book
received The Man booker Prize in literature in the same year. The author Julian
Barnes has written this novel keeping in mind of the young audience. It can be
said that it’s a YA fiction – which stands for Young Adult fiction.
The title of the
novel is taken from Frank Kermode’s book with the same name, The Sense of an
Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction. It holds the detailed study of
modern fiction and its contemporary usage in literature.
The novel is
divided into two parts, ‘One’ and ‘Two’. It holds the sharpness of language
with brevity. As if Barnes has enlivened the quote – “Brevity is the soul of
wit”. The matter-of-fact writing style is one of the iconic of Barns’
writing styles. Apart from the positive critical reception of the novel, it
also holds some drawbacks.
The novel sets
up in the USA, where, three Science Sixth school friends, Tony Webster, Colin,
and Alex make a promise for a life-long, friendship. The protagonist, Tony
Webster recalls his memories of his meeting with Adrian Finn and his encounter
with Veronica Ford.
However, the
first-person narration of the novel seems very unreliable due to several
reasons like first-hand tempering of the memory element, compromising the
philosophical thoughts with past by the protagonist, so on and so forth.
Where it all begins…
It would be more
agreeable to argue about the unreliability of the narration by first putting a
quote:
... then the Last Judgment begins, & its Vision is
Seen by the Imaginative Eye of Every one according to the situation he holds. –
BLAKE
To elaborate the
quote regarding the present novel, the notion of thinking about the characters
and their context differs from reader to reader. Blake talks about the Last
Judgment in a different context and the vision which is to be seen by the
people at large is going to be very fictional and imaginative, a bit at length
away from reality. So here, in this novel, how Tony is narrating the story of
his past younger days is much unreliable.
To cite a few
quotes from the original text, can prove the narrative technique on its own.
I remember, in no particular order (Barnes, 3)
The first
initial line itself defines the unreliability of the narration; if the narrator
doesn’t remember in any particular order, readers may raise doubts and
questions about the forthcoming pages and events. But as a postmodern novel, it
is open to interpretation and questions.
Positively
looking at the unreliability of the narrative technique, one can presumably
ponder a bit deeper in the arena of what T S Eliot has mentioned as The Theory
of Depersonalization, in which the author has to remove the personal
experiences and detach itself from the very content.
Here, a quote by
Umberto Eco would be applicable:
"A narrator should not supply interpretations of his work;
otherwise he would not have written a novel, which is a machine for generating
interpretations."
— Umberto Eco, postscript
to The Name of the Rose
Moreover
to the quote, the novel has much more to do with autobiographical aspects, as
it already seems. Tony Webster sometimes clarifies what he wants to say by
tempering his memory by going in his past.
The use of
negative sentences gives more weight to the unreliable tone. Here it goes as:
I’m not very interested
in my schooldays, and don’t feel any nostalgia for them. But school is where it
all began, so I need to return briefly to a few incidents that have grown into
anecdotes, to some approximate memories which time has deformed into certainty.
If I can’t be sure of the actual events any more, I can at least be true to the
impressions those facts left. That’s the best I can manage. (Barnes, 4)
Readers’ dilemma…
The novel begins with hyphens. As a postmodernist text, ‘The
Sense of an Ending’ has an ample amount of hyphens to connect the dots
between fragmented memories. There are some markers also that signify the loose
cohesion between the first and the second part.
Readers may
get confused and mislead when they reach half way round the novel. The
fragments of the memory are as follows.
—a shiny inner wrist;
—steam rising from a wet sink as a hot frying
pan is laughingly tossed into it; —gouts of sperm circling a plughole, before
being sluiced down the full length of a tall house;
—a river rushing nonsensically upstream, its
wave and wash lit by half a dozen chasing torchbeams;
—another river, broad and grey, the direction of
its flow disguised by a stiff wind exciting the surface;
—bathwater
long gone cold behind a locked door. (Barnes, 3)
Here are
the markers where readers get confused. Secondly, the narration begins with a
deep philosophical excerpt that lead the readers in time, space and its malleability.
The questions are automatically answered in the trajectory of the narration but
one has to refer to the first page again and again for connecting the dots.
Julian
Barnes as a postmodern author, has aptly used the subjectivity for Tony
Webster. Where Tony himself finds the memory very tempered at the age of sixty.
He recalls the incident of meeting Veronica and her family at her home, and
comes across the word ‘damage’. He questions himself:
What
did I mean by “damage”? It was only a guess; I didn’t have any real evidence.
But whenever I looked back on that unhappy weekend, I realised that it hadn’t
been just a matter of a rather naïve young man finding himself ill at ease
among a posher and more socially skilled family. (Barnes, 43)
When
one does any work or task with utmost consciousness, one doesn’t need to
clarify their decisions, actions and give justifications to anyone. If so
happens it becomes shallow to discuss or further the story. But here the unreliability
comes up when Tony elaborates the word ‘damage’:
When
I wrote to Adrian, I wasn’t at all clear myself what I meant by “damage.” And
most of a lifetime later, I am only slightly clearer. (Barnes, 43)
The Question of Accumulation
How could an individual conclude any of
such unreliability when it comes on the table of the postmodern fiction? Though
it’s agreeable that the modern angst leads to the generation of the anxious,
autobiographical literature which possibly may hold some looseness in their prose
but here the prose style is matter-of-fact yet it’s unreliable. As Adrian Finn
points out several integers and makes some equations out of the real life experiences,
one can possibly put an analogy of the accumulated points. But one has to be
careful in making any opinions from the face value of anything.
'The
falseness of an opinion is not ... any objection to it,' says Nietzsche, adding
that the only relevant question is 'how far the opinion is life-furthering,
life-preserving, species-preserving.' (Kermode, 50)
Here,
we can conclude that the novel contains unreliable narration with unsuitable
fragments that make some disposition in reader’s mind. Yet the novel stands as
one of the milestones of the postmodern fiction. It suggests multiple interpretations
to unfold and encourages readers to question the content, context, characters and
narration.
Works
Cited
Barnes, Julian. The
Sense of an Ending. Vintage, 2011.
Fish, David. "Book Review: The Name of the Rose by
Umberto Eco." Medium,
16 May 2017, dsfish.medium.com/book-review-the-name-of-the-rose-by-umberto-eco-265be0c09e79.
Kermode, Frank. The
Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction with a New Epilogue.
PDF, Oxford UP, USA, 2000.